But Anthropic also imposed limits that Michael views as fundamentally incompatible with war-fighting. The company’s internal “Claude Constitution” and contract terms prohibit the model’s use in, for instance, mass surveillance of Americans or fully autonomous lethal systems—even for government customers. When Michael and other officials sought to renegotiate those terms as part of a roughly $200 million defense deal, they insisted Claude be available for “all lawful purposes.” Michael framed the demand bluntly: “You can’t have an AI company sell AI to the Department of War and [not] let it do Department of War things.”
Tasks that failed before cleanup now complete (75% faster initially)
，更多细节参见新收录的资料
GNU and the AI reimplementationsantirez 1 hour ago. 2193 views. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. A sentence that I never really liked, and what is happening with AI, about software projects reimplementations, shows all the limits of such an idea. Many people are protesting the fairness of rewriting existing projects using AI. But, a good portion of such people, during the 90s, were already in the field: they followed the final part (started in the ‘80s) of the deeds of Richard Stallman, when he and his followers were reimplementing the UNIX userspace for the GNU project. The same people that now are against AI rewrites, back then, cheered for the GNU project actions (rightly, from my point of view – I cheered too).
倒也不是说外壳 100% 都一样——