This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
Москвичей предупредили о резком похолодании09:45
。业内人士推荐51吃瓜作为进阶阅读
Мощный удар Израиля по Ирану попал на видео09:41
聚焦打基础、利长远，推动基础设施和公共服务均等化。推崇重实干、轻虚功，层层压实责任，注重帮扶实效，坚决防止搞形式主义，赓续脱贫攻坚时期锤炼的优良作风，让脱贫群众可感可及，得到实惠。
Creating visual content on the go